Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Clemency Hearings 2015

Today, after reading about last night's execution of Brian Keith Terrell, Mr. Kramer introduced the project that we'll be doing to close the unit, a series of clemency hearings where students will be making arguments about whether death row inmates should be executed or should be granted clemency of some sort.
Clemency Arguments Assignment
To help facilitate your argument, the following resources will be helpful:
http://www.capitalpunishmentincontext.org/
http://deathpenaltycurriculum.org/node/90
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/

Your first task is to complete a preparation sheet, that is a required part of this assignment.
Prep sheet for state/victim
Prep sheet for defense/inmate
You'll then work with your partners to outline and divide the parts of your presentation.

Here is a link to the RUBRIC that will be used to grade your argument.

Groups and case assignments are posted below:


Period 1
Inmate
State
Ashley/Josh
Jamie/Nick
Claude/Brittany//AJ
Rachel/Noah
Will/Billy
Hillary/Kyle
Annie/Lizzie
David/Ben/Bijan
Sara/Becca Horwitz/Emily
Isaac/Dylan
Morgan/Becca Hyland
Evan/Dillon/Jake



Period 6
Inmate
State
Lindsay/Kyle
Sophia/Britney/Nick
Jared/Nathan
Isabel/Caroline
Rosie/Ryan
MacKenzie/David
Justin/Tommy/Riley
Alex/Michael
Lexi/Max
Will/Jovan
Marnie/Lizzie
Noah/George/Lucy



Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Death Penalty Info Contd.

Today in class, we'll continue our work gathering information from the sources listed yesterday.

Monday, December 7, 2015

Death Penalty Information

Now that you've looked at an individual case study (Clifford Boggess), explored the law and read about the basics of the arguments for and against the death penalty, it's time to examine its current status and how it operates. Please follow the steps below and blog your responses to the questions. Your responses should correspond to the individual bullet points. Make sure you are specific and detailed in your responses.  This is a required post and may count for this week.
  • Read about the STAGES in a death penalty case. Be sure you understand all of the different steps involved.  You need to read about all of the subtopics prior to clicking the arrow to move to the next stage (i.e. read about all of the steps in the pre-trial phase before moving on to the guilt phase) If the full text is not showing up in the interactive interface, click on this LINK to read the text without the graphics.
  • RESPOND-What aspects of the stages in a capital case are designed to protect the rights of the accused? Do you believe that this system is sufficient to guarantee that only the guilty are convicted?
  • Read about the different METHODS of execution.
  • RESPOND-Which of these (if any) are the most humane? Should any be considered “cruel and unusual” according to the 8th Amendment? If so which? Why?
  • Look at this table comparing states. Then note;Which states have the most inmates on Death Row? Which states have no death penalty? Which state has the most inmates on death row? Can you hypothesize any reasons for the differences?  Now look at the murder rates on this MAP. Going back to the table, can you make any conclusions by using both sets of data?
  • Explore the demographic data here.   Make sure you click on both the number of inmates on death row as well as the number of executions. Questions to consider as you explore include:  Are there more blacks or whites on death row? Which state has the most women on death row? Are more men or women on death row? Why aren’t there any statistics for juveniles on death row? Are there differences in number of executions by ethnicity?
  • Look at the information on this MAP What is the most commonly used method of execution in those states that have the death penalty? 
  • RESPOND-What sorts of conclusions can you draw from this data? What does the state by state data tell us about how the death penalty is used? What regional or other trends do you see? What might this data tell us about issues of equality, arbitrariness,and justice?
  • Click on this document to read the former Illinois Capital Murder statute. RESPOND-How many aggravating factors are listed that might have led to the death penalty?  What do you think of them? ? Should the crimes listed have death as a potential punishment? Why or why not? Go HERE to see more information about the death penalty in Illinois prior to its abolishment. Does the data tell you anything about why the Illinois death penalty is no longer in effect? If not, make an inference.
  • Take a look at the updated FACT SHEET put out by the Death Penalty Information Center.  This is current as of 12/2/2015.  Make some conclusions based on this information.
  • RESPOND-How does the information here influence your previous responses? What does this data say about the economics of the death penalty? What does the data say about the influence of race on the death penalty? What does the data say about public opinion for the death penalty? What does the data say about innocence?  About deterrence?  Looking at the information overall, what point of view would you say that the Death Penalty Information center has? Is it convincing? Why or why not? What additional information would you like?
  • BONUS-For fans of the TV Show Dexter. Read the blogs posted here and here. RESPOND: If Dexter was caught, should he receive the death penalty? Why or why not? 

Thursday, December 3, 2015

Death Penalty Arguments

Today we discussed the Execution of Clifford Boggess by debating the aggravating and mitigating factors in his case. Then we began to look at the larger arguments both for and against the death penalty. Students were assigned to read the arguments and take notes about both sides as they read this READING PACKET.  Students in Period One did the reading in class on Thursday. Students in Period 6 will do the reading in class on Friday.

Tuesday, December 1, 2015

The Execution

Today we took a quiz on the Constitutionality of the Death Penalty and then began to watch the documentary, The Execution. We took notes during the film by trying to keep track of the aggravating and mitigating factors in Clifford Boggess' case.